Thursday, 8 December 2011

Ethanol, Fertilizer & Higher Natural Gas Prices

What does growing corn and other crops have anything to do with natural gas? It takes about 33,000 cubic feet of natural gas to produce one ton of nitrogen fertilizer. About 96 percent of the corn planted in the United States depends on fertilizers, such as Anhydrous Ammonia (NH3), 28pct-Liquid Nitrogen, Urea and Ammonium Sulfate. Fertilizers consume more than three percent of total U.S. natural gas use. The ethanol boom could dramatically impact natural gas prices.
Some 90 percent of the cost of manufacturing nitrogen fertilizer depends upon the price of natural gas. The more fertilizer produced, the more natural gas is utilized and the higher both eventually cost. And according to widely followed natural gas commentator Phil Flynn of Chicago-based Alaron Trading, "Ethanol plants are going to require natural gas consumption to produce electricity." Flynn hadn't yet conducted a study into how much natural gas consumption would be required for these plants, but said in a telephone interview that he could be pursuing this.
We asked Flynn if the ethanol mania would have any impact on natural gas prices. "Absolutely," he responded, citing that increased corn planting would require natural gas for the nitrogen-based fertilizers and to power the 116 existing ethanol plants. Another 78 plants are now being constructed. Flynn pointed out natural gas prices would benefit from the 'front and back end' of the ethanol boom.
Nearly 95 percent of U.S. ethanol distilleries use natural gas boilers. Citigroup analyst Gil Yang estimated 28 billion cubic feet of natural gas would be consumed for every one billion gallons of ethanol produced. Cumulative ethanol production could surpass 12 billion gallons. Some analysts are predicted a natural gas demand increase up to one percent from the ethanol boom. But their estimates do not include increased fertilizer demand to increase corn yields.
Record Corn Planting and Natural Gas
Corn acreage is one of the largest consumers of nitrogen-based fertilizer. And because of the recent ethanol subsidies, more corn will be planted this year than in the past six decades. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, corn growers intend to plant 90.5 million acres in 2007. Because forecasts of ethanol production are expected to increase, expect more corn to be grown. In 2008, about 25 percent of U.S. corn production is planned to produce ethanol. By 2012, 4.3 billion bushels of corn are anticipated for ethanol production. It takes about 450 pounds of corn to produce 25 gallons of ethanol fuel to power an SUV.
The recent ethanol boom has become a blessing for fertilizer companies and their share prices. Since this past summer, shares in Saskatchewan-based Potash Corp have more than doubled to a record $191.46/share. The company is the world's largest potash producer and a significant producer of nitrogen fertilizers. Shares in Illinois-based CF Industries have nearly tripled in the same period. The company manufactures both nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers. Both have benefited from relatively lower natural gas prices in the face of strong demand for their products.
In 2004, about 12 million tons of nitrogen nutrients were consumed. But the increased corn planting has begun causing shortages in nitrogen fertilizers, according to Potash chief executive William Doyle. He told Bloomberg News last week that some farmers are not receiving sufficient fertilizer supplies because transportation facilities are nearly overloaded with shipments. This could impact fertilizing in mid summer if supplies continue to remain tight.
Corn planting takes place now through May in the Midwestern U.S. Some farmers pre-plant their nitrogen in March and April and skip the 'side dressing' in the summer. Fertilizing is generally done for two to three weeks at corn planting time. Side dressing is done over another two to three week period in July. "Knee high by the Fourth of July," describes when the second fertilization is done. This refers to the height of the corn and represents the last fertilizer application for the growing season. Side dressing is said to give plants a boost and provide an easy, smooth and better harvest.
We talked with an Ohio farmer who told us, "Even though we farmers are complaining about the additional cost of fertilizer, we can not afford to not apply adequate amounts for corn production." He explained, "If 28-percent Nitrogen costs me $100/ton more, and I use one-third ton per acre, that is an additional cost of $33/acre. With a yield of 150 bushels/acre, the cost is $0.22 more per bushel. But if corn prices are $1.50/bushel higher, then I can't afford to under-apply the nitrogen." There is a better return in higher corn-producing states, such as Iowa and Illinois, where yields are 200 bushels per acre.
The western Ohio farmer also compared his fertilizer costs for this season compared to previous plantings. "In 2000, my cost for NH3 was $242/ton," he said. This year's cost has nearly doubled to $580/ton. For the 2001 planting season, he paid $165/ton for 28-percent liquid nitrogen. His costs would have been about $280/ton for this season, but he pre-paid for this fertilizer in December, paying about the same he would have paid in 2004. For every one dollar increase or decrease in natural gas prices, fertilizer prices can swing up or down by 95 cents.
For this farmer's fertilizer applications, he prefers 28-percent liquid nitrogen for each of handling and application. While anhydrous ammonia (NH3) can also be used, and is cheaper per unit of nitrogen, he finds it is less safe for use. NH3 is also a favorite among the illegal methamphetamine-manufacturers, which siphon off the ammonia from farmer's nursing tanks. Urea is volatile and used mainly for wheat, but it also used by western Corn Belt farmers.
Fertilizer prices have more than doubled over the past 15 years, and there is no respite in the near-term. A recent Energy Information Administration outlook forecasts benchmark natural gas prices rising by 9.2 percent in 2007 and increasing another 3.7 percent in 2008. World demand for fertilizers grew by 13 percent between 2001 and 2005, according to The Fertilizer Institute. After China and India, the U.S. is the world's third largest nitrogen producer. Next year, the Ohio farmer could be faced with a steeper bill to fertilize his corn and other crops.
Global Nitrogen Demand to Drive Natural Gas Demand
The ethanol success story in Brazil has spread worldwide. Fortunately for Brazil, ethanol is produced by sugarcane, not corn. The country relies mostly upon non-nitrogen-based potash for its fertilizer - possibly as much as 6.5 million tons in 2007. But Brazil's productivity of liter per hectare from sugarcane dwarfs corn's productivity.
According to The Worldwatch Institute, sugarcane yields about 6,500 liters of ethanol for every hectare compared to less than 3,000 liters of ethanol produced on every corn hectare in the United States. The ratio of energy output of sugarcane, compared to the fossil energy input required to produce ethanol, is higher than 8 times. The same ratio applied to corn stands between 1.3 and 1.8.
As with all commodity discussions, one must talk about China and India. Ethanol production is rising, but remains far below the percentage shares of the U.S. and Brazil. Fertilizers are serious business in China, where nearly 50 million tonnes of fertilizer are annually consumed. By 2011, fertilizer production could top 63.5 million metric tons, according to China's National Agricultural and Rural Economic Development (NARED). Of this, China hopes to produce 42 million metric tons of nitrogen fertilizers.
By 2020, there could be as little as 0.2 hectares of agricultural land per person. But China is faced with a significant problem while maintaining an annualized 7.5-percent GDP growth rate during this time. How will China obtain sufficient natural gas to reach this target?
Earlier this month, a senior adviser to the National Development and Reform Committee (NDRC) announced, "We are seeing difficulties importing gas." China has been stymied in meeting its annual LNG import target of 20 million tons by 2015. The country has been attempting to reduce its dependence on imported oil by increasing use of natural gas.
China's NDRC has targeted natural gas to comprise 8 percent of the country's energy mix to help ease the pollution burden the coal industry places on China. The country is the world's largest copper consumer and the largest steel manufacturer. For its energy, it draws heavily upon its coal production - and is now expected to become a net importer of coal for 2007.
High natural gas prices have forced China to rely more upon coal and accelerate its emphasis on the country's growing natural gas sector. In March, PetroChina and Royal Dutch Shell PLC started commercial production in the joint venture's Changbei gas field in northwestern China. Other natural gas fields in southwestern China, PetroChina's Longgang gas field, and Sinopec Corp's Pugang gas field in Sichuan province, may both show promise in increasing gas's role in the country's energy mix. But the NDRC's plans of 92 billion cubic meters of natural gas production by 2010 is likely to fall short. At this time, gas may only reach a bit higher, at 5.3 percent, of the China's overall energy production.
Which brings us back to fertilizer. China plans to annually increase grain productive capacity by 0.65 percent within five years - and hopes to decrease planted grain acreage by 0.18 percent. The state planning commissions will be forced to improve yields. Hence, we expect an increased reliance upon nitrogen fertilizers to realistically achieve the country's target. Significant percentage increases in nitrogen-based fertilizers may be needed to overcome the poor soil nutrients in China.
How will China reconcile lowered expectations of natural gas imports in the context of increasing nitrogen-based fertilizers? We have previously covered China's emerging coalbed methane (CBM) sector because (a) the country hopes to reduce the number of coal mining accidents resulting from methane explosions and (b) CBM can help increase the country's energy mix.
According to the Carbon Finance Unit of The World Bank, China has placed a significant emphasis on coal methane projects. China's National Climate Change Coordination Committee place coal methane projects into the top four prioritized categories for developing projects. Over a 20-year period, China hopes to reduce the carbon dioxide equivalent of 40 million tons by capturing the methane gas from the country's coal mines and utilizing the gas to produce clean energy.
Now there is a third reason to follow the country's CBM sector. A large share of China's coalbed methane consumption has been allocated for nitrogen-based fertilizers. The industry generally depends upon methane gas for nitrogen production. As the country increases fertilizer production, the country's state-owned CUCBM (China United Coalbed Methane) company will play a responsible role in helping bring many early-days CBM projects into production.
This could also explain BP Plc's announcement, earlier this year, planning to heavily invest in the expansion of the company's CBM fields in the San Juan Basin (Colorado, New Mexico). BP plans to spend more than $2 billion to increase its methane gas production. Other countries are also looking to CBM as another way to meet the increased demand for natural gas.
When CUCBM began awarding the production-sharing contracts (PSC) to foreign-owned companies, such as Far East Energy, Green Dragon Gas, Fortune Oil and Pacific Asia China Energy, the company probably did not forecast a large share of the methane production to be produced from the coalbed would go for fertilizer production. But, at this stage, this could increasingly become the case.
As the world moves forward to manufacture ethanol for its energy needs, or to make its soil yield a greater harvest, the role of natural gas could increase dramatically. Subsequently, the floor for natural gas prices could begin escalating as has been found with many other commodities. Not just in the United States, but in many other countries where fertilizer consumption could grow by leaps and bounds.
COPYRIGHT© 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
James Finch contributes to StockInterview.com and other publications. His focus on the uranium mining and nuclear fuel sector resulted in the widely popular “Investing in the Great Uranium Bull Market,” which is now available on [http://www.stockinterview.com] and on http://www.amazon.com/
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_Finch

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/551467

Ethanol, Fertilizer & Higher Natural Gas Prices

What does growing corn and other crops have anything to do with natural gas? It takes about 33,000 cubic feet of natural gas to produce one ton of nitrogen fertilizer. About 96 percent of the corn planted in the United States depends on fertilizers, such as Anhydrous Ammonia (NH3), 28pct-Liquid Nitrogen, Urea and Ammonium Sulfate. Fertilizers consume more than three percent of total U.S. natural gas use. The ethanol boom could dramatically impact natural gas prices.
Some 90 percent of the cost of manufacturing nitrogen fertilizer depends upon the price of natural gas. The more fertilizer produced, the more natural gas is utilized and the higher both eventually cost. And according to widely followed natural gas commentator Phil Flynn of Chicago-based Alaron Trading, "Ethanol plants are going to require natural gas consumption to produce electricity." Flynn hadn't yet conducted a study into how much natural gas consumption would be required for these plants, but said in a telephone interview that he could be pursuing this.
We asked Flynn if the ethanol mania would have any impact on natural gas prices. "Absolutely," he responded, citing that increased corn planting would require natural gas for the nitrogen-based fertilizers and to power the 116 existing ethanol plants. Another 78 plants are now being constructed. Flynn pointed out natural gas prices would benefit from the 'front and back end' of the ethanol boom.
Nearly 95 percent of U.S. ethanol distilleries use natural gas boilers. Citigroup analyst Gil Yang estimated 28 billion cubic feet of natural gas would be consumed for every one billion gallons of ethanol produced. Cumulative ethanol production could surpass 12 billion gallons. Some analysts are predicted a natural gas demand increase up to one percent from the ethanol boom. But their estimates do not include increased fertilizer demand to increase corn yields.
Record Corn Planting and Natural Gas
Corn acreage is one of the largest consumers of nitrogen-based fertilizer. And because of the recent ethanol subsidies, more corn will be planted this year than in the past six decades. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, corn growers intend to plant 90.5 million acres in 2007. Because forecasts of ethanol production are expected to increase, expect more corn to be grown. In 2008, about 25 percent of U.S. corn production is planned to produce ethanol. By 2012, 4.3 billion bushels of corn are anticipated for ethanol production. It takes about 450 pounds of corn to produce 25 gallons of ethanol fuel to power an SUV.
The recent ethanol boom has become a blessing for fertilizer companies and their share prices. Since this past summer, shares in Saskatchewan-based Potash Corp have more than doubled to a record $191.46/share. The company is the world's largest potash producer and a significant producer of nitrogen fertilizers. Shares in Illinois-based CF Industries have nearly tripled in the same period. The company manufactures both nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers. Both have benefited from relatively lower natural gas prices in the face of strong demand for their products.
In 2004, about 12 million tons of nitrogen nutrients were consumed. But the increased corn planting has begun causing shortages in nitrogen fertilizers, according to Potash chief executive William Doyle. He told Bloomberg News last week that some farmers are not receiving sufficient fertilizer supplies because transportation facilities are nearly overloaded with shipments. This could impact fertilizing in mid summer if supplies continue to remain tight.
Corn planting takes place now through May in the Midwestern U.S. Some farmers pre-plant their nitrogen in March and April and skip the 'side dressing' in the summer. Fertilizing is generally done for two to three weeks at corn planting time. Side dressing is done over another two to three week period in July. "Knee high by the Fourth of July," describes when the second fertilization is done. This refers to the height of the corn and represents the last fertilizer application for the growing season. Side dressing is said to give plants a boost and provide an easy, smooth and better harvest.
We talked with an Ohio farmer who told us, "Even though we farmers are complaining about the additional cost of fertilizer, we can not afford to not apply adequate amounts for corn production." He explained, "If 28-percent Nitrogen costs me $100/ton more, and I use one-third ton per acre, that is an additional cost of $33/acre. With a yield of 150 bushels/acre, the cost is $0.22 more per bushel. But if corn prices are $1.50/bushel higher, then I can't afford to under-apply the nitrogen." There is a better return in higher corn-producing states, such as Iowa and Illinois, where yields are 200 bushels per acre.
The western Ohio farmer also compared his fertilizer costs for this season compared to previous plantings. "In 2000, my cost for NH3 was $242/ton," he said. This year's cost has nearly doubled to $580/ton. For the 2001 planting season, he paid $165/ton for 28-percent liquid nitrogen. His costs would have been about $280/ton for this season, but he pre-paid for this fertilizer in December, paying about the same he would have paid in 2004. For every one dollar increase or decrease in natural gas prices, fertilizer prices can swing up or down by 95 cents.
For this farmer's fertilizer applications, he prefers 28-percent liquid nitrogen for each of handling and application. While anhydrous ammonia (NH3) can also be used, and is cheaper per unit of nitrogen, he finds it is less safe for use. NH3 is also a favorite among the illegal methamphetamine-manufacturers, which siphon off the ammonia from farmer's nursing tanks. Urea is volatile and used mainly for wheat, but it also used by western Corn Belt farmers.
Fertilizer prices have more than doubled over the past 15 years, and there is no respite in the near-term. A recent Energy Information Administration outlook forecasts benchmark natural gas prices rising by 9.2 percent in 2007 and increasing another 3.7 percent in 2008. World demand for fertilizers grew by 13 percent between 2001 and 2005, according to The Fertilizer Institute. After China and India, the U.S. is the world's third largest nitrogen producer. Next year, the Ohio farmer could be faced with a steeper bill to fertilize his corn and other crops.
Global Nitrogen Demand to Drive Natural Gas Demand
The ethanol success story in Brazil has spread worldwide. Fortunately for Brazil, ethanol is produced by sugarcane, not corn. The country relies mostly upon non-nitrogen-based potash for its fertilizer - possibly as much as 6.5 million tons in 2007. But Brazil's productivity of liter per hectare from sugarcane dwarfs corn's productivity.
According to The Worldwatch Institute, sugarcane yields about 6,500 liters of ethanol for every hectare compared to less than 3,000 liters of ethanol produced on every corn hectare in the United States. The ratio of energy output of sugarcane, compared to the fossil energy input required to produce ethanol, is higher than 8 times. The same ratio applied to corn stands between 1.3 and 1.8.
As with all commodity discussions, one must talk about China and India. Ethanol production is rising, but remains far below the percentage shares of the U.S. and Brazil. Fertilizers are serious business in China, where nearly 50 million tonnes of fertilizer are annually consumed. By 2011, fertilizer production could top 63.5 million metric tons, according to China's National Agricultural and Rural Economic Development (NARED). Of this, China hopes to produce 42 million metric tons of nitrogen fertilizers.
By 2020, there could be as little as 0.2 hectares of agricultural land per person. But China is faced with a significant problem while maintaining an annualized 7.5-percent GDP growth rate during this time. How will China obtain sufficient natural gas to reach this target?
Earlier this month, a senior adviser to the National Development and Reform Committee (NDRC) announced, "We are seeing difficulties importing gas." China has been stymied in meeting its annual LNG import target of 20 million tons by 2015. The country has been attempting to reduce its dependence on imported oil by increasing use of natural gas.
China's NDRC has targeted natural gas to comprise 8 percent of the country's energy mix to help ease the pollution burden the coal industry places on China. The country is the world's largest copper consumer and the largest steel manufacturer. For its energy, it draws heavily upon its coal production - and is now expected to become a net importer of coal for 2007.
High natural gas prices have forced China to rely more upon coal and accelerate its emphasis on the country's growing natural gas sector. In March, PetroChina and Royal Dutch Shell PLC started commercial production in the joint venture's Changbei gas field in northwestern China. Other natural gas fields in southwestern China, PetroChina's Longgang gas field, and Sinopec Corp's Pugang gas field in Sichuan province, may both show promise in increasing gas's role in the country's energy mix. But the NDRC's plans of 92 billion cubic meters of natural gas production by 2010 is likely to fall short. At this time, gas may only reach a bit higher, at 5.3 percent, of the China's overall energy production.
Which brings us back to fertilizer. China plans to annually increase grain productive capacity by 0.65 percent within five years - and hopes to decrease planted grain acreage by 0.18 percent. The state planning commissions will be forced to improve yields. Hence, we expect an increased reliance upon nitrogen fertilizers to realistically achieve the country's target. Significant percentage increases in nitrogen-based fertilizers may be needed to overcome the poor soil nutrients in China.
How will China reconcile lowered expectations of natural gas imports in the context of increasing nitrogen-based fertilizers? We have previously covered China's emerging coalbed methane (CBM) sector because (a) the country hopes to reduce the number of coal mining accidents resulting from methane explosions and (b) CBM can help increase the country's energy mix.
According to the Carbon Finance Unit of The World Bank, China has placed a significant emphasis on coal methane projects. China's National Climate Change Coordination Committee place coal methane projects into the top four prioritized categories for developing projects. Over a 20-year period, China hopes to reduce the carbon dioxide equivalent of 40 million tons by capturing the methane gas from the country's coal mines and utilizing the gas to produce clean energy.
Now there is a third reason to follow the country's CBM sector. A large share of China's coalbed methane consumption has been allocated for nitrogen-based fertilizers. The industry generally depends upon methane gas for nitrogen production. As the country increases fertilizer production, the country's state-owned CUCBM (China United Coalbed Methane) company will play a responsible role in helping bring many early-days CBM projects into production.
This could also explain BP Plc's announcement, earlier this year, planning to heavily invest in the expansion of the company's CBM fields in the San Juan Basin (Colorado, New Mexico). BP plans to spend more than $2 billion to increase its methane gas production. Other countries are also looking to CBM as another way to meet the increased demand for natural gas.
When CUCBM began awarding the production-sharing contracts (PSC) to foreign-owned companies, such as Far East Energy, Green Dragon Gas, Fortune Oil and Pacific Asia China Energy, the company probably did not forecast a large share of the methane production to be produced from the coalbed would go for fertilizer production. But, at this stage, this could increasingly become the case.
As the world moves forward to manufacture ethanol for its energy needs, or to make its soil yield a greater harvest, the role of natural gas could increase dramatically. Subsequently, the floor for natural gas prices could begin escalating as has been found with many other commodities. Not just in the United States, but in many other countries where fertilizer consumption could grow by leaps and bounds.
COPYRIGHT© 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
James Finch contributes to StockInterview.com and other publications. His focus on the uranium mining and nuclear fuel sector resulted in the widely popular “Investing in the Great Uranium Bull Market,” which is now available on [http://www.stockinterview.com] and on http://www.amazon.com/
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_Finch

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/551467

Gas Rebate Cards - Save Money on Gas Purchases

Purchasing gas is unavoidable for anyone that drives a vehicle. Even hybrid vehicles, although they use less of it, need gas to operate. With gas prices on a rise, many people are seeking ways to save on gas. While carpooling and cut backs on driving are viable options, these are not always the most convenient methods of saving on gas. Many people have found that gas rebate cards are extremely beneficial for saving money on gas. These rebate cards offer monetary incentives based on the amount of gas purchased. The most popular form of gas rebate cards are credit cards offered by companies that provide gas. These cards give back a percentage of each month's gas purchase.
Cardholders see this amount credited to their monthly balance. Ultimately, card holders of gas rebate cards pay less for gas than they would otherwise. The amount of the rebate depends on the percentage offered by the creditor. The amount varies from company to company. A cardholder could see anywhere from 1% to 5% rebate from a gas rebate card. The average among all the cards is 3%. Some gas companies offer a high rebate amount for an introductory period. This introductory period can last anywhere from three months to a year. During this period of time, cardholders receive the highest rebate available from that particular company. However, after this introductory period, the rebate percentage will drop.
Types of Available Cards
In most cases, gas rebate cards offered by the larger gas companies can only be used to purchase a specific brand of gas. These cards come with advantages and disadvantages. If you find that you purchase a specific kind of gas the majority of the time, a brand-specific card would benefit you. Since you already purchase this specific brand, you will not have to change your gas purchasing habits. There are some people that choose to shop around for the lowest gas prices rather than sticking to a specific brand. These people would not benefit as much from a brand-specific card. When you are traveling, it is possible that the brand of gas for which you have a rebate card is not available. There are some gas rebate cards that are not specific to a particular brand of gas. These cards are found to be more convenient because cardholders have the freedom to use their card at any gas station. Usually, these kinds of cards reward cardholders with percentage points for general purchases in addition to gas purchases. The reward percentage for these general purchases is often a few percentage points lower than what is received for gas.
For example, cardholders might receive 3% rebate for gas purchases, while receiving 1% for other kinds of purchases made with the card. Gas rebate cards that provide rewards for gas as well as other kinds of purchases have various methods for rebating rewards to cardholders. Sometimes these rewards are in the form of a credit to the balance on the credit card. This credit is usually seen on the statement at the end of each month. In other cases, the reward is received as a gift card for a brand of gas or a vendor. When rewards are made in the form of a gift card, they are seen on a less frequent basis, like annually, or semi-annually.
Restrictions and Disadvantages
While there are some obvious advantages to using a gas rebate card, there are some restrictions involved that can cast the cards in an unfavorable light. Since these restrictions vary among cards, it is best to find out associated restrictions before applying for a card. Some cards only reward rebates for payments made at the pump. Any gas purchased inside the gas station at the counter will not receive the rebate. This restriction is not imposed very often since most people find it more convenient to pay at the pump. However, there might be a rare situation in which you need to make the payment inside the store. If this restriction applies to your card, you should be aware that a rebate will not be received for this purchase. The best way to get around this stipulation is to use the rebate card at the pump whenever possible.
Other card companies impose limits on the amount of rebates that a cardholder can receive in a period of time. For example, once you have received $500 in rebates during a year, you will not receive additional rebates until the next year. Depending on the reward percentage rate, this limit might not ever be reached unless you purchase gas frequently or several people in a household use the card. Most people are aware that gas rebate cards have the highest interest rate of all cards available. Cardholders that carry a balance from one month to the next will find that the total amount paid is much higher than if they had paid the balance in full the first month. Letting the balance carry over into a new month ultimately nullifies the benefit of the rebate reward.
Choosing a Card
Since there are so many different kinds of cards and rebates available, it is best for prospective applicants to research cards and their rebates to make an informed decision. The best kind of gas rebate card to choose is one that does not place limits on the amount of rebate that can be received during a period of time. Alternatively, if you must choose a card that has a limit, you should search for one that has the highest limit possible. When you choose a card, you should find out about the percentage of the rebate rewarded. If there is an introductory period, you should know how long the period lasts and the rebate percentage once the introductory period has ended. Some cards gradually decrease the percentage after the introductory period while others decrease it by a few percentage points. To receive the maximum benefit from gas rebate cards, it is best for cardholders to pay off the balance of the card every month. Carrying the balance each month incurs extra charges and negates the rebate.
Gerard Heitz www.0-apr-creditcards.com/gas-rebate-cards.htm [http://www.0-apr-creditcards.com/gas-rebate-cards.htm]
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerard_Heitz

Convert Your Barbecue Gas Grill To Natural Gas

Everyone who does more than casual cooking on their gas grill should convert from propane to natural gas if at all possible. The ultimate convenience of not running out of gas or having to change the tank is definitely worth the time, effort and cost. Gas grilling is a great hobby. It is so easy and accessible to go outside to your grill - take off the grill cover and pronto - the grill is ignited! No leftover charcoal ashes to clean up first. No need to find a bag of charcoal, No need to empty the charcoal briquettes into the grill and light.No fear of is there enough propane in the tank to cook the steaks?
However, most gas grills purchased today by consumers are equipped to use bottled propane gas that comes in a refillable container. Thus, in order to ensure that you will not run out of propane gas while you are grilling, you must have a spare container of propane gas available. If the first container should happen to run low while you are grilling, you can quickly replace the empty container with the full one and continue the cooking process. Murphy's law holds especially while grilling - expect the propane container to empty while you are in the middle of cooking those great ribs. Panic! And of course it will only happen when you are entertaining guests.
How do you eliminate this problem? Convert from propane to natural gas for your gas grill and have a continuous flow and endless supply of natural gas forever in the future. What is the difference? What must I do? Why won't my grill work as is on natural gas? We will now answer all of those questions and explain how to convert from propane to natural gas on your grill. But before you can convert from propane to natural gas, you will need to have a accessible source of natural gas for your gas grill with a quick disconnect connector. Assuming you already have natural gas coming into your house for cooking or heating purposes, a connection can be brought to your grilling area by a plumber.
First, what is the difference between propane and natural gas? Propane is stored in a container under much pressure. Therefore the orifices that control the gas flow in your grill have a smaller opening for propane. The smaller orifice allows the proper flow of natural gas to escape to the burner and ignite. If you connect a gas grill fitted with propane orifices to a natural gas supply, the pressure in the natural gas line is much less and an insufficient amount of natural gas would escape the orifice to the gas burner. Not enough natural gas would reach the burner to ignite properly. There needs to be an larger orifice for sufficient natural gas to escape to the burner to ignite properly.
Most gas grill manufacturers will offer a natural gas orifice for your model grill. Contact your local distributor - he will be able to order new natural gas orifices for you if he does not have them in stock. The difficulty of changing from propane to natural gas orifices depends upon your grill. Some gas grills have easier access to the orifices than others. Usually detailed directions will be provided with the new orifices.
After the natural gas orifices are installed but before you reassemble the rest of the grill, you will want to test all of your connections for any leaks. To do this test, do not light any burners. Make sure all of the burner orifices are closed or in the shut off position. Connect your gas supply hose to the natural gas connection. Turn on the natural gas. Using soapy water around each connection, see if any gas bubbles appear at any of the connections. If you detect a leak - shut off the natural gas, Repair the connection and repeat the test. Once you determine that there are no leaks, finish reassembling the gas grill. Congratulations! You will never run out of a supply of gas while grilling again.
Ed Grace is a barbecue fanatic and webmaster of website http://www.practical-barbecue-grill-guide.com/ Visit his website today for Barbecue & Grilling Information.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Edward_Grace

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/314153

Sprott Analyst Has Zero Doubt on Higher Natural Gas Prices

Introduction: We talked with Sprott Asset Management Research Analyst Eric Nuttall about the natural gas situation in Canada and the fate of many CBM gas producers and developers. Since our last conversation spot natural gas prices have dropped by 15 percent. Natural gas storage levels are about 2.5 trillion cubic feet, some 423 billion cubic feet higher than a year ago.
Eric Nuttall told us, "Nearly all small-cap natural gas producers have taken it in the teeth this year. The price decreases in their stocks have been absolutely brutal. There are now companies whose stocks are down 40 percent year-to-date, and yet are still strongly growing production on an adjusted share basis." How will the CBM and natural gas sector pan out through the end of this year? He believes the gas storage surplus will correct itself.
StockInterview: How are the lower natural gas prices impacting Coalbed Methane producers?
Eric Nuttall: For many CBM or shallow gas producers, this means their current drilling program is likely uneconomic, suggesting deferrals in drilling programs until natural gas prices strengthen. It is this very supply response that we need to balance storage levels, so it should not come as a complete surprise.
StockInterview: What, then, should investors do while storage levels are rebalancing?
Eric Nuttall: I would view this period as an opportunity for medium to long-term minded individuals to start building positions in not just unconventional gas producers, but conventional ones as well. The long-term fundamentals are still extremely bullish for natural gas. Many quality names are down 20 to 40 percent year-to-date.
StockInterview: How do you view the long-term fundamentals for gas?
Eric Nuttall: North American natural gas production has been in decline for several years. Most incremental production is coming from smaller, more expensive-to-drill, thinner economic, higher decline pools and reservoirs. Over the past five years first-year decline rates on natural gas wells have doubled to 50 percent. The base decline rate has also doubled to approximately 25 to 30 percent. Pool size has also decreased materially over that time frame. The Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and much of the US producing basins are mature. Consequently, higher and higher natural gas prices are required to create incentive for producers to drill increasingly marginal wells.
StockInterview: And you expect a continuation of declining natural gas production? And that is that your premise for higher natural gas pricing?
Eric Nuttall: Conventional gas production has been in decline for many years, and the growth areas have largely been unconventional, such as the Piceance Basin (tight gas), the Barnett Shale (shale gas), and the Jonah Field (tight, deep gas). Also, many of the growth assets, such as the Barnett Shale, are already a few years into development, and because the wells have such a steep decline rate in the first few years, it is only adding to the depleting base that we have to make up. It is unlikely that over the next three years, the increase in unconventional gas can offset the decline in conventional, because the depleting base is so much larger. The major natural gas basins in North America are mature. Decline rates are increasing. Pool size is decreasing. Rig count is increasing yet production is at best flat. Until LNG imports increase in a material way, which is not expected for at least four or five more years, I think the case for healthy natural gas prices is intact.
StockInterview: Earlier, you noted drilling was more expensive.
Eric Nuttall: Over the past year, onshore drillings costs are up over 15 percent while operating costs are up over 10 percent. A recent Wall Street Journal article commented on how rig rates for the Gulf of Mexico, on very deep drilling platforms, are as high as $520,000 per day, up from $185,000 a few years ago. And the drilling platforms are still leaving the Gulf of Mexico! Although many are leaving the Gulf of Mexico to go to more prospective areas such as the West African Coast, the current rig situation is still somewhat tight in the Gulf. We have only begun to see signs of moderating rig rate pricing.
StockInterview: How would bad weather, such as a hurricane, impact natural gas prices?
Eric Nuttall: Short term, you would see both natural gas and related stocks surge. If a hurricane strikes the producing area of the Gulf, and we almost need one to - to correct the surplus supply situation. Initially, you'll have an emotional upward response. Only after assessing the status of production platforms and sub-sea infrastructure would we know the longer-term impact.
StockInterview: Should investors be watching the Weather Channel and ready to phone their stockbrokers?
Eric Nuttall: Timing on any natural gas investment right now is tricky. You need to have a medium- to longer-term focus. We probably have another two months of volatility. There are two camps right now on natural gas. One camp is saying that due to bloated storage levels companies are going to increasingly lay down their drilling rigs, cut production guidance, and stress their balance sheets. Then in the fall, when companies set their 2007 budgets, they will be using low gas prices and presenting moderating production growth profiles to their investors.
StockInterview: What does the other camp say?
Eric Nuttall: Another camp says that the current natural gas strip already discounts the present and forecasted storage levels. Also, stocks are cheap on a price-to-cash flow and price-to-net asset value ratios, and now is the time to load up on the stocks. I lean towards this viewpoint. But I am also admitting that until the fall, barring a severe hurricane, it is likely that the stocks are going to trade sideways, as opposed to in any clear direction.
StockInterview: One equities strategist, whom we interviewed, suggested some time in August we might start to see the natural gas stocks moving higher.
Eric Nuttall: There is the potential that we might endure another month or two of flat trading in small cap natural gas stocks. By the end of August, it is likely that we will have had both a supply and demand response - worries of massive laying down of rigs, forced well shut-in's, and overleveraged balance sheets should have subsided. Investors will begin to focus on the natural gas strip rather than spot prices, which currently are around $9.00 for the upcoming winter and $8.00 for next summer.
StockInterview: And until then?
Eric Nuttall: Until that time comes, I think it likely, as a group, the large caps will outperform. They are more weighted towards oil, and have recently been catching a bid on the heel of a huge $22 billion all-cash takeover by Anadarko of Western Gas and Kerr-McGee. Importantly for unconventional gas investors, Anadarko paid around $2.00 for 3P (Possible) Mcf, which is very healthy (Western Gas was predominantly tight gas in Wyoming and coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin). It speaks to Anadarko's view of strong long-term natural gas fundamentals. These all-cash transactions likely set the bottom in the large caps.
StockInterview: What do you see for the near-term?
Eric Nuttall: Many people have been hoping that warm weather or hurricanes would assist in working off the excess supply, but Mother Nature hasn't been terribly helpful so far this summer. It appears that we will exit the natural gas injection season at least 10% over last year. Barring any incredible heat waves or significant hurricanes, natural gas prices are likely to remain sub-$6.50 until the fall. Unless we have a serious hot spell or a significant hurricane, it is likely that natural gas stocks will be very volatile without clear direction over the summer into the fall. I would think not until the fall, probably September - October, when people begin to focus not on natural gas spot prices, but on the strip pricing for the winter, which is still over C$10. Until that time comes, I wouldn't see any clear direction in the stocks. The market is now providing opportunities to buy companies with high quality management for below-average multiples, commonly measured on a price-to-cash flow metric.
StockInterview: Have you given up on the CBM sector or is it coming back?
Eric Nuttall: There is zero doubt in my mind that natural gas is an excellent long-term investment. We've peaked in our ability to increase production meaningfully, just as we have with light oil. I think for there to be an increase in long-term natural gas supply, you have to provide incentive to producers to go drill wells that increasingly have lower economic rates of return. And to do that, you need higher natural gas prices. One of the few remaining growth prospects in Canada for natural gas production is coalbed methane. At current gas prices, the economics are very challenging. So to get a supply response from coalbed methane producers, you again need higher gas prices. The current surplus in gas storage will correct itself, and investors should position themselves ahead of natural gas stocks reacting to this inevitability.
COPYRIGHT © 2007 by StockInterview, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
James Finch contributes to StockInterview.com and other publications. StockInterview’s “Investing in the Great Uranium Bull Market” has become the most popular book ever published for uranium mining stock investors. Visit [http://www.stockinterview.com]
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_Finch

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/245551

Gas Grill Buying Tips For Barbecue Enthusiasts

Gas grills are a popular choice among barbecue enthusiasts. Mainly because compared to charcoal grills, gas grills are easier to clean. In addition, there are lesser accidents related to the use of gas grills and in ten minutes it is ready to barbecue. For those thinking of buying a gas grill or upgrading to a gas grill for grilling, there are a number of things to consider before purchasing one. Taking these few tips into consideration will make the search faster and easier, and in the end the grill you purchase will be more satisfying for you to use.
1. Three Levels Of Gas Grills
Entry-level
Thesegas grills are the most basic gas grills available in the market today. They are reasonable priced starting at $ 150 to $ 300. Entry-level gas grills don't need wood or charcoal and produce their own heat. With regards to this type of gas grill, it is best to choose one made of stainless steel for the frame and main body.
Mid-Range
These gas grills on the other hand are a bit more expensive but also offer more features than the basic gas grill. Prices for mid-range gas grills range from $ 350 to $ 1150. For these types of gas grills it is best to choose those made by established manufacturers in order to get a quality product.
Deluxe Models
These gas grills are the cream of the crop with prices starting at $ 1500 and most models going for more than $ 5000. High-end gas grills often make use of big BTU ratings as a selling point for them. However the brand name and materials of the gas grill should be the main concern when buying a deluxe model gas grill.
2. Basic Elements Of A Gas Grill
The basic structure of most gas grills sold in the market is fairly straightforward. The burners generate heat and some type of heat dispersal system is above the burners. On top of all this are the cooking grates where the food is placed. The equipment underneath the hood is what separates a typical gas grill from an excellent gas grill. A gas grill that has at least two or more individual burners allow for greater heat control. This provides for even heat over the cooking surface thus producing better tasting food. Drippings cannot be avoided when barbecuing, however this causes flare-ups. Certain gas grills are equipped with systems to control flare-ups and turn it into flavorful smoke to enhance the flavor of the food.
3. Understanding BTU (British Thermal Units)
Most gas grills sold in the market use BTUs as the main selling of their product. However most people don't understand the relevance of BTUs to a gas grill, let alone the meaning of BTU. BTU stands for British thermal unit, which indicates the amount of gas that a gas grill is able to burn. With gas grills, sometimes less BTU are better since it allows for food to cook more efficiently. Too much of it can damage the burners and cut short the life of the gas grill. However for larger grills, having higher BTUs is best in order to cover the larger cooking area.
4. Check For Solid Construction
It is important to select a gas grill with a stable and solid construction. A poorly built gas grill has the tendency to wiggle and may fall apart once set in place. Avoid buying a gas grill that is not displayed on the sales floor, make sure that there is a display available to be able to check out the stability of the gas grill before purchasing it. Select a gas grill that is crafted of high-grade U.S. Steel and also go for a gas grill with a baked-on, porcelain enamel finish. Check that the grates are made from either cast iron, porcelain-coated cast iron or aluminum and stainless steel.
5. Gas Grill Maintenance
When buying a gas grill it is important to consider the amount of maintenance required to keep it running for years to come. Select a brand of gas grill that provides uncomplicated yet comprehensive product information and offers a toll-free customer service line. Check if the brand provide trouble-free access to parts and services along with a reliable dealer network.
For more great gas grill related articles and resources check out [http://gasgrills.dinningstyle.com]
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=John_Morris

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/154582